User:FraizerBeall653

First I'd far better define specifically what I mean by a UFO. To me, a bona-fide UFO is any UFO that remains a UFO after comprehensive study and analysis by qualified experts have failed to determine the object as any known natural or man-produced phenomena. The tag 'unidentified' means that the conclusion was that it couldn't have even been a possible or feasible natural or man-made phenomena, in spite of this what specifically it was remains totally 'unidentified' and possibly forever unidentifiable. Observational evidence is suggestive that these bona fide UFOs can be extraterrestrial visitations - the extraterrestrial hypothesis (ETH).

One may ague and come to a conclusion that despite the fact that it can be achievable aliens would stumble over our humble abode at the cosmos, it is extremely improbable that it would happen within our lifetime; using the last few generations. It's vastly much more achievable a visitation would have happened in ancient times, prehistoric times, possibly millions if not billions of years ago. While there is something to be stated for that, there is certainly the counter argument that having visited when, the 'tourist attraction' we call Earth would develop into ongoing.

Fast forward a couple of billions of years and our alien scientists or explorers (biologists this time) picked up a trilobite or two for their interstellar zoo or museum collection. And I'd bet even aliens could have been fascinated using the dinosaurs! Perhaps in our hypothetical interstellar zoo, terrestrial dinosaurs continue to strut their stuff, having suffered a pre-historical UFO abduction!

Alas, the odds any physical evidence of such vastly ancient prehistoric visitations or surveys or expeditions would be so uncommon, eroded away or deeply buried, that such musings will probably forever remain simply wild speculations. All witnesses are extinct at present!

But moving from millions of prehistoric years ago to extra recent prehistoric eras, up by means of and which includes ancient history, say inside the last 100,000 years, then we may well start becoming some additional concrete pictorial evidence (cave art) or other archaeological, anthropological or mythological evidence - which obviously brings us towards the topic of 'ancient astronauts'. All I'll say on that's that plenty of of the typical literature on the topic is bovine fertilizer or pure balderdash. But I'm not going to be so rash as to go on record as saying all of it really is.

There's a song by country-pop singer Shania Twain that goes some thing which include "That do not impress me significantly". Specifically, as soon as watching 'ancient astronaut' documentaries, or even reading the typical literature, I've never ever been impressed by the monuments argument that aliens either built them or helped humans to build them - monuments like Stonehenge or the pyramids (Egyptian or Mesoamerican) or the statutes on Easter Island. That's selling human abilities short. I'm also not impressed with so called ancient technologies - thousands of year old batteries for instance that look around as alien as a Model T Ford.

What does impress me are a variety of particularly anomalous and alien in look historical art works - photos, cave art, paintings, sculptures, etchings, some of big size just like the Nazca line drawings in Peru so of course created to be viewed from a high altitude. Also of interest is mythology and comparative mythology that could be suggestive of 'ancient astronauts'. These are legitimate and worthy locations for scholarly investigation, given the significance of the subject.

So, why the sudden surge in UFO activity in current generations - 1947 to date? Well, perhaps there hasn't been - a surge that's.