Edit Paper: Integration of Scholarly Communication Metadata using Knowledge Graphs

Jump to: navigation, search

You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reason:

The action you have requested is limited to users in the group: Users.

Integration of Scholarly Communication Metadata using Knowledge Graphs

Abstract[edit]

[[has abstract:={{{Abstract}}}]]

Conclusion[edit]

[[has conclusion:={{{Conclusion}}}]]

Future work[edit]

[[has future work:={{{Future work}}}]]

Approach[edit]

Positive Aspects: [[Has PositiveAspects::{{{PositiveAspects}}}]]

Negative Aspects: [[Has NegativeAspects::{{{NegativeAspects}}}]]

Limitations: [[Has Limitations::{{{Limitations}}}]]

Challenges: [[Has Challenges::{{{Challenges}}}]]

Proposes Algorithm: [[Proposes Algorithm::{{{ProposesAlgorithm}}}]]

Methodology: [[uses Methodology::{{{Methodology}}}]]

Requirements: [[Has Requirements::{{{Requirements}}}]]

Limitations: [[Has Limitations::{{{Limitations}}}]]

Implementations[edit]

Download-page: [[Has Downloadpage::{{{Download-page}}}]]

Access API: [[access API::{{{API}}}]]

Information Representation: [[Has InfoRepresentation::{{{InfoRepresentation}}}]]

Data Catalogue: [[Has DataCatalouge::{{{Catalogue}}}]]

Runs on OS: [[ runsOn OS::{{{OS}}}]]

Vendor: [[Has vendor::{{{vendor}}}]]

Uses Framework: [[Uses Framework::{{{Framework}}}]]

Has Documentation URL: [[Has DocumentationURL::{{{DocumentationURL}}}]]

Programming Language: [[implementedIn ProgLang::{{{ProgLang}}}]]

Version: [[has Version ::{{{Version}}}]]

Platform: [[has platform::{{{Platform}}}]]

Toolbox: [[uses Toolbox::{{{Toolbox}}}]]

GUI: has GUI::No

Research Problem[edit]

Subproblem of: [[Has Subproblem::{{{Subproblem}}}]]

RelatedProblem: [[Has relatedProblem::{{{RelatedProblem}}}]]

Motivation: [[Has motivation::{{{Motivation}}}]]

Evaluation[edit]

Experiment Setup: [[Has ExperimentSetup::{{{ExperimentSetup}}}]]

Evaluation Method : [[Has EvaluationMethod::{{{EvaluationMethod}}}]]

Hypothesis: [[Has Hypothesis::{{{Hypothesis}}}]]

Description: [[Has Description::{{{Description}}}]]

Dimensions: [[Has Dimensions::{{{Dimensions}}}]]

Benchmark used: [[has Benchmark::{{{Benchmark}}}]]

Results: [[Has Results::{{{Results}}}]]


[edit]
Paper Title*: Full title of the given paper
Subject: Primary subject or topic of research of the paper.
Author(s):
Publication venue: Publication venue of the paper.
Year: The year in which the paper is published.
Keywords:
Abstract: Abstract of the paper.
Conclusion:
Future work: Future ideas of the paper.
Problem: The research problem.
Approach: Approach used to achieve the goal.
Implementation: The implementation/framework that is invoked when running.
Evaluation: Proposed work Evaluation.
Positive Aspects:
Negative Aspects:
Limitations:
Challenges:
Proposes Algorithm:
Proposes Model:
Methodology:
Requirements:
Download-page:
Access API:
Information Representation:
Data Catalogue:
OS:
Vendor: Organization: commercial, free or otherwise
Uses Framework: Framework name
Documentation URL: Link to Documentation webpage.
Programming Language:
Version:
Platform:
Toolbox:
GUI: whether the implementation has a GUI?
Subproblem of: A broader research problem.
Related Problem: A another research problem.
Motivation: The motivation to solve the problem.


Experiment setup:
Evaluation method : A broader research problem.
Hypothesis: A another research problem.
Description: The motivation to solve the problem.
Dimensions:
Select evaluation dimension.
Benchmark: Benchmark used for evaluation.
Results:



Paper description:

Cancel

Retrieved from "https://www.openresearch.org/wiki/Integration_of_Scholarly_Communication_Metadata_using_Knowledge_Graphs"
Facts about "Integration of Scholarly Communication Metadata using Knowledge Graphs"
RDF feed
Access APINo data available now. +
Event in seriesTPDL +
Has BenchmarkNo data available now. +
Has ChallengesNo data available now. +
Has DataCatalouge{{{Catalogue}}} +
Has DescriptionNo data available now. +
Has DimensionsNo data available now. +
Has DocumentationURLhttp://No data available now. +
Has Downloadpagehttp://No data available now. +
Has EvaluationNo data available now. +
Has EvaluationMethodNo data available now. +
Has ExperimentSetupNo data available now. +
Has GUINo +
Has HypothesisNo data available now. +
Has ImplementationNo data available now. +
Has InfoRepresentationNo data available now. +
Has LimitationsNo data available now. +
Has NegativeAspectsNo data available now. +
Has PositiveAspectsNo data available now. +
Has RequirementsNo data available now. +
Has ResultsNo data available now. +
Has SubproblemNo data available now. +
Has VersionNo data available now. +
Has abstractImportant questions about the scientific c …
Important questions about the scientific community, e.g., what authors

are the experts in a certain field, or are actively engaged in international collaborations, can be answered using publicly available datasets. However, data required to answer such questions is often scattered over multiple isolated datasets. Recently, the Knowledge Graph (KG) concept has been identified as a means for interweaving heterogeneous datasets and enhancing answer completeness and soundness. We present a pipeline for creating high quality knowledge graphs that comprise data collected from multiple isolated structured datasets. As proof of concept, we illustrate the different steps in the construction of a knowledge graph in the domain of scholarly communication metadata (SCM-KG). Particularly, we demonstrate the benefits of exploiting semantic web technology to reconcile data about authors, papers, and conferences. We conducted an experimental study on an SCM-KG that merges scientific research metadata from the DBLP bibliographic source and the Microsoft Academic Graph. The observed results provide evidence that queries are processed more effectively on top of the SCM-KG than

over the isolated datasets, while execution time is not negatively affected.
execution time is not negatively affected. +
Has approachNo data available now. +
Has authorsAfshin Sadeghi +, Christoph Lange +, Maria-Esther Vidal + and Sören Auer +
Has conclusionIn this paper, we presented the concept of …
In this paper, we presented the concept of Scholarly Communication Metadata Knowledge Graph (SCM-KG), which integrates heterogeneous, distributed schemas, data and

metadata from a variety of scholarly communication data sources. As a proof-of-concept, we developed an SCM-KG pipeline to create a knowledge graph by integrating data collected from heterogeneous data sources. We showed the capability of parallelization in rule-based data mappings, and we also presented how semantic similarity measures are applied to determine the relatedness of concepts in two resources in terms of the relatedness of their RDF interlinking structure. Results of the empirical evaluation suggest that the integration approach pursued by the SCM-KG pipeline is able to effectively integrate pieces of information spread across different data sources. The experiments suggest that the rule based mapping together with semantic structure based instance matching technique implemented in the SCM-KG pipeline integrates data in a knowledge graph with high accuracy. Although our initial use case addresses the scientific metadata domain, we generated billions of triples with high accuracy in mapping and linking, and we regard it capable at an industrial scale and in use cases demanding high

precision.
and in use cases demanding high precision. +
Has future workIn the context of the OSCOSS project on Opening Scholarly Communication

in the Social Sciences, the SCM-KG approach will be used for providing authors with

precise and complete lists of references during the article writing process. +
Has motivationNo data available now. +
Has platformNo data available now. +
Has problemSemantifying scholarly artifacts +
Has relatedProblemNo data available now. +
Has vendorNo data available now. +
Has year2017 +
ImplementedIn ProgLangNo data available now. +
Proposes AlgorithmNo data available now. +
RunsOn OSNo data available now. +
TitleIntegration of Scholarly Communication Metadata using Knowledge Graphs +
Uses FrameworkNo data available now. +
Uses MethodologyNo data available now. +
Uses ToolboxNo data available now. +