Difference between revisions of "User:Floebe"
(→Technical: extended critique of Property:Homepage) |
(→For Scientists: + an idea for hiding contents) |
||
(10 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
** submission of an abstract | ** submission of an abstract | ||
** submission of the paper | ** submission of the paper | ||
+ | * Concerning the description of [[Template:Event]]: how do "submission deadline" and "paper deadline" relate to each other? The explanatory note sounds like "paper deadline" is-a "submission deadline". On the one hand ok, on the other I see the problem for lists of upcoming deadlines that one must see the abstract submission deadline first, otherwise you may miss that.<br> | ||
+ | :My proposal on this issue: in the ontology, view "abstract deadline" as well as "paper deadline" as "submission deadline" and find a solution for displaying tables which have several "submission deadline" links. (How do the tables treat multiple entries/1:m relations, actually?) | ||
+ | |||
==== Journals ==== | ==== Journals ==== | ||
* Journals can have an ISSN assigned, as well as an E-ISSN<br> | * Journals can have an ISSN assigned, as well as an E-ISSN<br> | ||
Line 32: | Line 35: | ||
== Technical == | == Technical == | ||
− | + | ||
− | |||
=== Implementation Changes Required === | === Implementation Changes Required === | ||
+ | ==== Major ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== Minor ==== | ||
* The [[Property:Homepage]] should not always add a "http"-prefix, because one may link to pages with other protocols like https, ftp, etc. Moreover, I suggest this in general for all uses of the property, because e.g. for copying links a browser context menu, the "http"-prefix is included in the copied text. Then, it is annoying to remove it. The best solution for editing would be to detect whether there is a protocol part at the beginning, then keep it, and if not, add "http" as default. For viewing, one may similarly cut off the http-prefix. Personally, I don't find it disturbing.<br> | * The [[Property:Homepage]] should not always add a "http"-prefix, because one may link to pages with other protocols like https, ftp, etc. Moreover, I suggest this in general for all uses of the property, because e.g. for copying links a browser context menu, the "http"-prefix is included in the copied text. Then, it is annoying to remove it. The best solution for editing would be to detect whether there is a protocol part at the beginning, then keep it, and if not, add "http" as default. For viewing, one may similarly cut off the http-prefix. Personally, I don't find it disturbing.<br> | ||
:ex1: [[Frank Loebe|my homepage]] has a "https"-prefix.<br> | :ex1: [[Frank Loebe|my homepage]] has a "https"-prefix.<br> | ||
:ex2: I had the editing problem on the [[RuleML 2008]] page, pasting the link into the field. | :ex2: I had the editing problem on the [[RuleML 2008]] page, pasting the link into the field. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== Nice to have ==== | ||
+ | * <span style="color:red">open 13.09.2008</span> edit support for selecting ontology entities<br> | ||
+ | :Editing support for selecting semantic properties and classes would be highly beneficial, e.g., enhancing the toolbar of the editing field with a class and a property browser would be a first step.<br> | ||
+ | :(Meanwhile, the listings at [[Special:Categories]] and [[Special:Properties]] are valuable.) | ||
== Integration of Existing Data == | == Integration of Existing Data == | ||
Line 47: | Line 57: | ||
* Can one simply copy short descriptions from other websites? | * Can one simply copy short descriptions from other websites? | ||
:ex: The short description of KER from [http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJournal?jid=KER] for [[The Knowledge Engineering Review]] | :ex: The short description of KER from [http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJournal?jid=KER] for [[The Knowledge Engineering Review]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | = Potential Use Cases for OpenResearch = | ||
+ | == For Scientists == | ||
+ | * personal event listings | ||
+ | ** ideas | ||
+ | *** management of events related to submissions (to be considered for submission, where sth was submitted etc.) or participation | ||
+ | *** generation of next years lists via conference series (e.g., if RuleML 2008 was interesting for submission in 2008, the 2009 event could be copied to the submission list for 2009) | ||
+ | *** on publicity: introduce pages representing relations with an encoded name, and use one or a few general relations to link to other pages; this should allow for listings on those encoded pages which correspond to what one would like to remember ... ''to be tested'' | ||
+ | ** benefits over personal solutions | ||
+ | *** information is updated by all | ||
+ | *** available in RDF | ||
+ | |||
+ | == For Conference Organizers == | ||
+ | * CfP generation | ||
+ | ** ideas | ||
+ | *** new workflow for CfPs: add stuff to OpenResearch via Templates, generate a pre-CfP from this, then a final edit; this requires e.g. plain-text export templates (to send CfP mails). | ||
+ | *** if no changes are made to the CfP, one may even record to which lists it should go and send it from OpenResearch; but I don't think this will be adopted soon. |
Latest revision as of 11:11, 26 September 2008
See Frank Loebe for general information in OpenResearch, or go directly to my workpage at https://wiki.imise.uni-leipzig.de/FrankLoebe .
Improvements to OpenResearch
Organizational
Major
- the underlying ontology
- I see major problems of a coordinated evolution of the underlying ontology, i.e., that people use the right relationships etc.
- How will the model evolve, who adapts the data to this?
- I believe that dedicated editors are required to harmonize the categorization of entities into subject fields
- how to treat the temporalization of the data
- e.g., if the editorial board of a journal changes
- Options
- Keep only current info as semantic, historical should reside in the histories
- Try to maintain past info as semantic, e.g. "had EB member" ... but a better solution is required.
Minor
General Policies
- use of abbreviations for URIs is no good idea, because if all science is to be covered, there will be many disambiguations
- ex: AAMAS = (Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, The American Association of Medical Audit Specialists, ...(?) )
Events
- sometimes, event descriptions can have "resort names" or "hotel names" as more precise specification of the hotel -> not covered in the ontology
- there are at least two types of (initiating) submission dates to be distinguished:
- submission of an abstract
- submission of the paper
- Concerning the description of Template:Event: how do "submission deadline" and "paper deadline" relate to each other? The explanatory note sounds like "paper deadline" is-a "submission deadline". On the one hand ok, on the other I see the problem for lists of upcoming deadlines that one must see the abstract submission deadline first, otherwise you may miss that.
- My proposal on this issue: in the ontology, view "abstract deadline" as well as "paper deadline" as "submission deadline" and find a solution for displaying tables which have several "submission deadline" links. (How do the tables treat multiple entries/1:m relations, actually?)
Journals
- Journals can have an ISSN assigned, as well as an E-ISSN
- Journals can have several editors
Technical
Implementation Changes Required
Major
Minor
- The Property:Homepage should not always add a "http"-prefix, because one may link to pages with other protocols like https, ftp, etc. Moreover, I suggest this in general for all uses of the property, because e.g. for copying links a browser context menu, the "http"-prefix is included in the copied text. Then, it is annoying to remove it. The best solution for editing would be to detect whether there is a protocol part at the beginning, then keep it, and if not, add "http" as default. For viewing, one may similarly cut off the http-prefix. Personally, I don't find it disturbing.
- ex1: my homepage has a "https"-prefix.
- ex2: I had the editing problem on the RuleML 2008 page, pasting the link into the field.
Nice to have
- open 13.09.2008 edit support for selecting ontology entities
- Editing support for selecting semantic properties and classes would be highly beneficial, e.g., enhancing the toolbar of the editing field with a class and a property browser would be a first step.
- (Meanwhile, the listings at Special:Categories and Special:Properties are valuable.)
Integration of Existing Data
- get Persons, Journals, Conferences etc. from DBLP
- in general, it should be a good idea to cooperate with them, perhaps cross-link
Legal Issues
- Can one simply copy short descriptions from other websites?
- ex: The short description of KER from [1] for The Knowledge Engineering Review
Potential Use Cases for OpenResearch
For Scientists
- personal event listings
- ideas
- management of events related to submissions (to be considered for submission, where sth was submitted etc.) or participation
- generation of next years lists via conference series (e.g., if RuleML 2008 was interesting for submission in 2008, the 2009 event could be copied to the submission list for 2009)
- on publicity: introduce pages representing relations with an encoded name, and use one or a few general relations to link to other pages; this should allow for listings on those encoded pages which correspond to what one would like to remember ... to be tested
- benefits over personal solutions
- information is updated by all
- available in RDF
- ideas
For Conference Organizers
- CfP generation
- ideas
- new workflow for CfPs: add stuff to OpenResearch via Templates, generate a pre-CfP from this, then a final edit; this requires e.g. plain-text export templates (to send CfP mails).
- if no changes are made to the CfP, one may even record to which lists it should go and send it from OpenResearch; but I don't think this will be adopted soon.
- ideas