|
|
| (10 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | {{Event
| + | MegaSpiderman333 / i am racing the 2011 zx10r not much defcerinfe i truelly dont like the abs braking and the rev limiter sucks and #1 con is tires first and foremost change out immediately dunlop Q2S . you can adjust the gearing i changed my setup to vortec reverse shifting and as always the rearend is very loose ( for those who owned the zx10r you know what im talking about) not to hip on the exhaust switch to full race duel exhaust. if your racing the bike the electronics are ok (power commander) RIDE HARD |
| − | |Acronym=ISMM 2010
| |
| − | |Title=International Symposium on Memory Management 2010
| |
| − | |Series=ISMM
| |
| − | |Type=Conference
| |
| − | |Field=Programming languages
| |
| − | |Start date=2010/06/05
| |
| − | |End date=2010/07/06
| |
| − | |Homepage=www.cs.purdue.edu/ISMM10/
| |
| − | |City=Toronto
| |
| − | |State=Ontario
| |
| − | |Country=Canada
| |
| − | |Abstract deadline=2010/02/03
| |
| − | |Paper deadline=2010/02/09
| |
| − | |Notification=2010/03/19
| |
| − | |Camera ready=2010/04/02
| |
| − | }}
| |
| − | International Symposium on Memory Management 2010
| |
| − | Toronto, June 5-6, 2010
| |
| − | http://www.cs.purdue.edu/ISMM10/
| |
| − | | |
| − | == CALL FOR PAPERS ==
| |
| − | | |
| − | ISMM is a forum for research in memory management. Areas of interest include
| |
| − | but are not limited to:
| |
| − | | |
| − | * Memory allocation and deallocation
| |
| − | * Garbage collection algorithms and implementations
| |
| − | * Compiler analyses and tools to aid memory management
| |
| − | * Empirical analysis of heap intensive programs
| |
| − | * Formal analysis and verification of heap intensive programs
| |
| − | * Memory system design and analysis
| |
| − | * Verification of memory management algorithms
| |
| − | * Development and evaluation of open source implementations
| |
| − | | |
| − | ISMM solicits full-length submissions covering new work on these topics, as
| |
| − | well as papers presenting confirmations or refutations of important prior
| |
| − | results. Surveys and comparative analyses that shed new light on previously
| |
| − | published techniques are also welcome.
| |
| − | | |
| − | == ORGANIZERS ==
| |
| − | | |
| − | General Chair: Jan Vitek, Purdue University
| |
| − | Program Chair: Doug Lea, State University of New York at Oswego
| |
| − | | |
| − | Program Committee:
| |
| − | * Hans Boehm, HP Labs
| |
| − | * Cliff Click, Azul Systems
| |
| − | * David Detlefs, Microsoft Research
| |
| − | * Dave Dice, Sun Microsystems
| |
| − | * Christine Flood, Sun Microsystems
| |
| − | * Daniel Frampton, Australian National University
| |
| − | * Samir Genaim, Complutense University of Madrid
| |
| − | * Richard Jones, University of Kent
| |
| − | * Simon Marlow, Microsoft Research
| |
| − | * Nick Mitchell, IBM T.J. Watson Research
| |
| − | * Filip Pizlo, Purdue University
| |
| − | * Martin Vechev, IBM T.J. Watson Research
| |
| − | * Adam Welc, Intel
| |
| − | | |
| − | == KEY DATES ==
| |
| − | | |
| − | Abstracts due: February 3, 2010
| |
| − | Submissions due: February 9, 2010
| |
| − | Author response: March 9-11, 2010
| |
| − | Notification: March 19, 2010
| |
| − | Final copy: April 2, 2010
| |
| − | Conference: June 5-6, 2010
| |
| − | | |
| − | == SUBMISSIONS ==
| |
| − | | |
| − | Submitted papers must be in English and formatted to print on US Letter (8.5 x
| |
| − | 11 inches) paper. Submissions must contain an abstract and postal and electronic
| |
| − | mailing addresses for at least one contact author. All papers must be submitted
| |
| − | on-line, preferably in Portable Document Format (PDF), although the submission
| |
| − | system will also accept PostScript. Submissions should be no more than 10 pages
| |
| − | (including bibliography, excluding well marked appendices) in standard ACM
| |
| − | SIGPLAN conference format: two columns, nine-point font (or larger) on a
| |
| − | ten-point baseline (or larger), with columns 20pc (3.33in) wide and 54pc (9in)
| |
| − | tall, and a column gutter of 2pc (0.33in). Detailed formatting guidelines along
| |
| − | with formatting templates or style files for LaTeX are available at
| |
| − | http://www.acm.org/sigs/sigplan/authorInformation.htm. Papers that violate these
| |
| − | guidelines will be rejected by the program chair. Program committee members are
| |
| − | not required to read appendices, and so a paper should be intelligible without
| |
| − | them. All accepted papers will appear in the published proceedings.
| |
| − | | |
| − | === Double-blind reviewing ===
| |
| − | | |
| − | Authors are anonymous to the reviewers, just as reviewers are anonymous to the
| |
| − | authors. Authors must take reasonable efforts not to disclose their identities
| |
| − | to reviewers: Do not give your names nor mention your institution, research
| |
| − | group or project name. Where necessary for flow, a stand-in name such as "XYZ",
| |
| − | may be used, with a footnote explaining that the actual name is withheld.
| |
| − | Discuss your own prior work in the third person, as you would other related
| |
| − | work. You may also provide reviewers with anonymous auxiliary material such as
| |
| − | proofs and source code via the PC Chair (see below). Reviewers, for their part,
| |
| − | will be honor-bound not to try to discover authors' identities until their
| |
| − | initial reviews are complete. Authors' identities will be revealed at a later
| |
| − | point in the program committee's deliberations, but will be known only to the
| |
| − | program chair until that point.
| |
| − | | |
| − | === Review committee ===
| |
| − | | |
| − | ISMM uses a separate Review Committee (RC) as part of the reviewing process. The
| |
| − | RC complements the Program Committee (PC) by providing expert reviews. The same
| |
| − | reviewing standards apply to the RC as for the PC. However, RC members review
| |
| − | only a few papers each, and do not participate in the PC meeting. The use of the
| |
| − | RC increases the breadth and depth of the reviewer pool.
| |
| − | | |
| − | === Rebuttal ===
| |
| − | | |
| − | The rebuttal process will occur in early March 2010, and will give the authors
| |
| − | opportunity to respond succinctly to factual errors in reviews, before the
| |
| − | program committee meets to make its decisions. The committee may, but need not,
| |
| − | respond to rebuttals or revise reviews at or after the committee meeting.
| |
| − | | |
| − | === Auxiliary Material ===
| |
| − | | |
| − | Authors may provide the PC Chair with a URL for upload of auxiliary material.
| |
| − | The URL itself will not be seen by reviewers. The authors may reference such
| |
| − | material in their paper, noting that the material has been made available to the
| |
| − | PC Chair. This facility may be used by authors to provide reviewers with useful
| |
| − | information beyond the scope of the submitted paper, such as technical reports,
| |
| − | proofs, and source code, without disclosing the authors' identity. Authors are
| |
| − | obliged to make reasonable efforts to make all auxiliary material suitably
| |
| − | anonymous. Authors are reminded that reviewers are under no obligation to read
| |
| − | any auxiliary material.
| |
| − | Papers accompanied by or based on open-source implementations are especially
| |
| − | welcome. However, if the authors are primary contributors to such a project,
| |
| − | they should provide source URLs separately to the Program Chair for validation,
| |
| − | and not list them in the submission proper.
| |
| − | | |
| − | === Proceedings ===
| |
| − | | |
| − | The proceedings will be published by the ACM. Authors should read the ACM Author
| |
| − | Guidelines and related information. Authors of accepted papers must guarantee
| |
| − | that their paper will be presented at the conference. For additional information
| |
| − | please feel free to contact the Program Chair.
| |
