Difference between revisions of "WM 2009"

From Openresearch
Jump to: navigation, search
(new based on website)
 
(vzxAhfeLhEUqvHpg)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Event
+
agree. Also, popele needing to be billable / account for every hour of the day mostly perceive an internal barrier to share insights with other popele, since these insights may be the main thing setting them a part from their colleagues. Or, the insights may enable them to get the job done quicker than their colleagues, as knowledge is a personal USP. Also, some organisations maintain some levels of  competition' within their organisation. Whether this is a good thing, I'll leave up to you to decide.To take this one level further . Let's assume that you have a company forum or wiki on which  general population' can post questions/share information; would this be done for things other than e.g. a lost file?The solution to these questions in my view lie in how one is rewarded for ones contribution to the wiki-content. So, how could participants whose contributions add value be rewarded?Looking at the client side  Is it the client or the product or service supplier who is hesitant to use a wiki?
|Acronym=WM 2009
 
|Title=Professional Knowledge Management 2009
 
|Series=WM
 
|Type=Conference
 
|Field=Information science
 
|Start date=2008/03/25
 
|End date=2008/03/27
 
|Homepage=www.km-conference2009.org/
 
|Logo=Logo-wm-2009.png
 
|City=Solothurn
 
|Country=Switzerland
 
}}
 
''Source:'' http://www.km-conference2009.org/
 
 
 
[[Category:Knowledge Management]]
 
 
 
== Sub-events ==
 
    *  CKME09 - 2nd Workshop on the Convergence of Knowledge Management and E-Learning
 
    * CWeb2.0 - Wissensnetzwerke und Soziale Software in Unternehmen (D)
 
    * CSKM2009 - Workshop on Case Studies and Success Measurement of KM
 
    * GWEM09 - 5th German Workshop on Experience Management
 
    * IKMS2009 - 2nd Workshop on Integrated Knowledge Management Systems
 
    * KSM09 - 1st Workshop on Knowledge Services & Mashups
 
* [[has sub event::PKM 2009]] - 1st Workshop on Personal Knowledge Management
 
    * ProWI09 - Produktive Wissensarbeit (D)
 
    * UWS09 - Unternehmensweite Suche (D)
 
    * WiBa09 - Wissensmanagement in Bank- und Finanzwirtschaft (D)
 
    * WIEM2009 - Messen, Bewerten und Benchmarken des wirtschaftlichen Erfolgs von Wissensmanagement (D)
 
    * WM4KM09 - Wissen greifbar machen - Praktikable Ansätze für KMU (D)
 
    * WMUK09 - Wissensmanagement und interne Unternehmenskommunikation (D)
 

Revision as of 21:05, 1 March 2012

agree. Also, popele needing to be billable / account for every hour of the day mostly perceive an internal barrier to share insights with other popele, since these insights may be the main thing setting them a part from their colleagues. Or, the insights may enable them to get the job done quicker than their colleagues, as knowledge is a personal USP. Also, some organisations maintain some levels of competition' within their organisation. Whether this is a good thing, I'll leave up to you to decide.To take this one level further . Let's assume that you have a company forum or wiki on which general population' can post questions/share information; would this be done for things other than e.g. a lost file?The solution to these questions in my view lie in how one is rewarded for ones contribution to the wiki-content. So, how could participants whose contributions add value be rewarded?Looking at the client side Is it the client or the product or service supplier who is hesitant to use a wiki?

Facts about "WM 2009"
AcronymWM 2009 +
End dateMarch 27, 2008 +
Event in seriesWM +
Event typeConference +
Has coordinates47° 19' 7", 7° 40' 11"Latitude: 47.318738888889
Longitude: 7.6698277777778
+
Has location citySolothurn +
Has location countryCategory:Switzerland +
Has sub eventPKM 2009 +
Homepagehttp://www.km-conference2009.org/ +
IsAEvent +
LogoLogo-wm-2009.png +
Start dateMarch 25, 2008 +
TitleProfessional Knowledge Management 2009 +