Difference between revisions of "RSL-IJCS 2017 : COGNITION AND COMPUTATION"
(talk) |
m (1 revision imported) |
(No difference)
|
Revision as of 12:06, 28 July 2017
RSL-IJCS 2017 : COGNITION AND COMPUTATION | |
---|---|
RSL-IJCS 2017 : COGNITION AND COMPUTATION
| |
Dates | Invalid date "Invalid date" contains an extrinsic dash or other characters that are invalid for a date interpretation. (iCal) - 2017/07/28
|
Homepage: | https://www.mulino.it/riviste/a/issn/2279-7777/newsitem/139 |
Location | |
Location: | N/A, undefined |
Loading map... | |
Important dates | |
Submissions: | 2017/07/31 |
Table of Contents | |
Call for Papers “Cognition and Computation”
Special issue of Reti, Saperi, Linguaggi. Italian Journal of Cognitive Sciences https://www.mulino.it/riviste/issn/2279-7777
One of the founding ideas of cognitive science is that cognition is essentially
computation. From the very start, many have denied this view, but in recent
times computationalism has increasingly come under attack from several different
fronts. From a quick glance at the current cognitive science scenario, one comes
away with the impression that several of the criticisms raised against the
computational view of mind, rather than leading to the abandonment of
computationalism altogether, have instead served to advancing it in several
respects. The aim of this call is to collect reflections regarding this
scenario. The following is a list of challenges to computationalism, by no means
exhaustive, which have spawned new research efforts within the computational
paradigm.
• Emotion and consciousness are the mental phenomena more often alleged as
defeating computational explanations. Seemingly, computations have affectless,
flavorless connotations. Yet, the challenge has been taken seriously, and today
research domains such as cognitive affective computation, and machine
consciousness, have grown remarkably.
• Embodiment and enactivism have been, and are today, the strongest alternatives
proposed to the computational view of mind. However, there are several new
research directions, within the computational paradigm, that emphasize the
embedding of computational systems within physical body structures and their
environment, like, for example, in the field of cognitive robotics.
• Predictive theories of the brain, spanning from Bayesian approaches to
free-energy principles, are finding increasingly wide audiences. Even if not
conceived as radical alternatives to computationalism, it is often argued that
these approaches imply a conceptual shift with respect to mainstream
computational modeling. However, others hold that several existing computational
modeling approaches can be given a natural probabilistic interpretation that is
compatible, and enriched, by the recent probabilistic theories of brain and
cognition.
• Mechanistic explanations are gaining traction in most special sciences,
especially biology and neuroscience. Even if in the early days computation was
often seen as the most precise way for explaining mechanisms, the new
mechanistic philosophers tend to conceptualize mechanisms in ways that do not
require computation. However, a big theoretical effort is currently underway
that relates the new notion of mechanism with computation once again.
• Computationalism has often been criticized for relying on concepts borrowed
from theoretical computer science, that lose sense when taken out of their
original context and applied to foreign realms like the mind. This criticism has
been raised, for example, in regard to computable functions, symbols,
computation complexity. Actually, recent advances within theoretical computer
science may offer new refined concepts that may greatly help cognitive science
as well. The notion of computation has itself been the center of deep
theoretical reflection. Computational complexity has significantly been
advanced, for example, with parameterized complexity theory, something that has
been recently applied in cognitive science.
The above suggestions are by no means exhaustive, and explorations of other
challenges faced by computationalism today are encouraged.
Invited Contributors Raúl Arrabales Mark Blokpoel, Johan Kwisthout, Iris van Rooij and Todd Wareham Marcello Frixione Alistair Isaac Marcin Miłkowski Vincent Müller Matthias Scheutz Roman Yampolskiy
Submissions should adhere to the following guidelines:
Articles should be submitted in blind review format. Please omit any self–identifying information within the abstract and body of the paper. Max length: 35.000 characters (including spaces, references and an abstract of no more than 150 words). Please use the APA citation style for references.
Language: English
Guest Editor: Alessio Plebe Submissions should be sent via e-mail to: aplebe[at]unime.it
Important dates:
Deadline for submissions: July 31th, 2017 Notification of acceptance: October 15th, 2017
Acronym | RSL-IJCS 2017 + |
End date | July 28, 2017 + |
Event type | Conference + |
Has coordinates | 35° 51' 9", -81° 26' 7"Latitude: 35.852369444444 Longitude: -81.435166666667 + |
Has location city | N/A + |
Has location country | Category:Undefined + |
Homepage | https://www.mulino.it/riviste/a/issn/2279-7777/newsitem/139 + |
IsA | Event + |
Submission deadline | July 31, 2017 + |
Title | RSL-IJCS 2017 : COGNITION AND COMPUTATION + |