Difference between revisions of "Towards a Knowledge Graph for Science"
(Created page with "{{Paper |Title=Towards a Knowledge Graph for Science |Authors=Sören Auer, Viktor Kovtun, Manuel Prinz, Anna Kasprzik, Markus Stocker, |Series=WIMS |Year=2018 |Keywords=Knowle...") |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Paper | {{Paper | ||
|Title=Towards a Knowledge Graph for Science | |Title=Towards a Knowledge Graph for Science | ||
+ | |Subject=Scholarly communication | ||
|Authors=Sören Auer, Viktor Kovtun, Manuel Prinz, Anna Kasprzik, Markus Stocker, | |Authors=Sören Auer, Viktor Kovtun, Manuel Prinz, Anna Kasprzik, Markus Stocker, | ||
|Series=WIMS | |Series=WIMS | ||
Line 26: | Line 27: | ||
of now, there are still very few of those tools, and their design | of now, there are still very few of those tools, and their design | ||
and concrete features remain a challenge that is yet to be tackled – collaboratively and in a coordinated manner. | and concrete features remain a challenge that is yet to be tackled – collaboratively and in a coordinated manner. | ||
− | |Future work=No data available now. | + | |Future work=The work presented here delineates our initial steps towards a |
+ | knowledge graph for science. By testing existing and developing | ||
+ | new components, we have so far focused on some core technical | ||
+ | aspects of the infrastructure. Naturally, there are a number of research | ||
+ | problems and implementation issues as well as a range of | ||
+ | socio-technical aspects that need to be addressed in order to realize | ||
+ | the vision. | ||
+ | Dimensions of open challenges are, among others: | ||
+ | • the low-threshold integration of researchers through methods | ||
+ | of crowd-sourcing, human-machine interaction, and social networks; | ||
+ | • automated analysis, quality assessment, and completion of the knowledge graph as well as interlinking with external sources; | ||
+ | • support for representing fuzzy information, scientific discourse and the evolution of knowledge; | ||
+ | • development of new methods of exploration, retrieval, and visualization of knowledge graph information. | ||
+ | |Problem=No data available now. | ||
|Approach=No data available now. | |Approach=No data available now. | ||
− | |||
|Implementation=No data available now. | |Implementation=No data available now. | ||
|Evaluation=No data available now. | |Evaluation=No data available now. |
Revision as of 09:28, 5 July 2018
Towards a Knowledge Graph for Science | |
---|---|
Towards a Knowledge Graph for Science
| |
Bibliographical Metadata | |
Subject: | Scholarly communication |
Keywords: | Knowledge Graph, Science and Technology, Research Infrastructure, Libraries, Information Science |
Year: | 2018 |
Authors: | Sören Auer, Viktor Kovtun, Manuel Prinz, Anna Kasprzik, Markus Stocker |
Venue | WIMS |
Content Metadata | |
Problem: | No data available now. |
Approach: | No data available now. |
Implementation: | No data available now. |
Evaluation: | No data available now. |
Contents
Abstract
The document-centric workflows in science have reached (or already exceeded) the limits of adequacy. This is emphasized by recent discussions on the increasing proliferation of scientific literature and the reproducibility crisis. This presents an opportunity to rethink the dominant paradigm of document-centric scholarly information communication and transform it into knowledge-based information flows by representing and expressing information through semantically rich, interlinked knowledge graphs. At the core of knowledge-based information flows is the creation and evolution of information models that establish a common understanding of information communicated between stakeholders as well as the integration of these technologies into the infrastructure and processes of search and information exchange in the research library of the future. By integrating these models into existing and new research infrastructure services, the information structures that are currently still implicit and deeply hidden in documents can be made explicit and directly usable. This has the potential to revolutionize scientific work as information and research results can be seamlessly interlinked with each other and better matched to complex information needs. Furthermore, research results become directly comparable and easier to reuse. As our main contribution, we propose the vision of a knowledge graph for science, present a possible infrastructure for such a knowledge graph as well as our early attempts towards an implementation of the infrastructure.
Conclusion
The transition from purely document-centric to a more knowledge-based view on scholarly communication is in line with the current digital transformation of information flows in general and is thus inevitable. However, this also creates a need for the implementation of corresponding tools and workflows supporting the switch. As of now, there are still very few of those tools, and their design and concrete features remain a challenge that is yet to be tackled – collaboratively and in a coordinated manner.
Future work
The work presented here delineates our initial steps towards a knowledge graph for science. By testing existing and developing new components, we have so far focused on some core technical aspects of the infrastructure. Naturally, there are a number of research problems and implementation issues as well as a range of socio-technical aspects that need to be addressed in order to realize the vision. Dimensions of open challenges are, among others: • the low-threshold integration of researchers through methods of crowd-sourcing, human-machine interaction, and social networks; • automated analysis, quality assessment, and completion of the knowledge graph as well as interlinking with external sources; • support for representing fuzzy information, scientific discourse and the evolution of knowledge; • development of new methods of exploration, retrieval, and visualization of knowledge graph information.
Approach
Positive Aspects: No data available now.
Negative Aspects: No data available now.
Limitations: No data available now.
Challenges: No data available now.
Proposes Algorithm: No data available now.
Methodology: No data available now.
Requirements: No data available now.
Limitations: No data available now.
Implementations
Download-page: No data available now.
Access API: No data available now.
Information Representation: No data available now.
Data Catalogue: {{{Catalogue}}}
Runs on OS: No data available now.
Vendor: No data available now.
Uses Framework: No data available now.
Has Documentation URL: No data available now.
Programming Language: No data available now.
Version: No data available now.
Platform: No data available now.
Toolbox: No data available now.
GUI: No
Research Problem
Subproblem of: No data available now.
RelatedProblem: No data available now.
Motivation: No data available now.
Evaluation
Experiment Setup: No data available now.
Evaluation Method : No data available now.
Hypothesis: No data available now.
Description: No data available now.
Dimensions: No data available now.
Benchmark used: No data available now.
Results: No data available now.
Access API | No data available now. + |
Event in series | WIMS + |
Has Benchmark | No data available now. + |
Has Challenges | No data available now. + |
Has DataCatalouge | {{{Catalogue}}} + |
Has Description | No data available now. + |
Has Dimensions | No data available now. + |
Has DocumentationURL | http://No data available now. + |
Has Downloadpage | http://No data available now. + |
Has Evaluation | No data available now. + |
Has EvaluationMethod | No data available now. + |
Has ExperimentSetup | No data available now. + |
Has GUI | No + |
Has Hypothesis | No data available now. + |
Has Implementation | No data available now. + |
Has InfoRepresentation | No data available now. + |
Has Limitations | No data available now. + |
Has NegativeAspects | No data available now. + |
Has PositiveAspects | No data available now. + |
Has Requirements | No data available now. + |
Has Results | No data available now. + |
Has Subproblem | No data available now. + |
Has Version | No data available now. + |
Has abstract | The document-centric workflows in science … The document-centric workflows in science have reached (or already exceeded) the limits of adequacy. This is emphasized by recent discussions on the increasing proliferation of scientific literature and the reproducibility crisis. This presents an opportunity to rethink the dominant paradigm of document-centric scholarly information communication and transform it into knowledge-based information flows by representing and expressing information through semantically rich, interlinked knowledge graphs. At
s an implementation of the infrastructure. +the core of knowledge-based information flows is the creation and evolution of information models that establish a common understanding of information communicated between stakeholders as well as the integration of these technologies into the infrastructure and processes of search and information exchange in the research library of the future. By integrating these models into existing and new research infrastructure services, the information structures that are currently still implicit and deeply hidden in documents can be made explicit and directly usable. This has the potential to revolutionize scientific work as information and research results can be seamlessly interlinked with each other and better matched to complex information needs. Furthermore, research results become directly comparable and easier to reuse. As our main contribution, we propose the vision of a knowledge graph for science, present a possible infrastructure for such a knowledge graph as well as our early attempts towards an implementation of the infrastructure. |
Has approach | No data available now. + |
Has authors | Sören Auer +, Viktor Kovtun +, Manuel Prinz +, Anna Kasprzik + and Markus Stocker + |
Has conclusion | The transition from purely document-centri … The transition from purely document-centric to a more knowledge-based view on scholarly communication is in line with the current digital transformation of information flows in general and is thus
llaboratively and in a coordinated manner. +inevitable. However, this also creates a need for the implementation of corresponding tools and workflows supporting the switch. As of now, there are still very few of those tools, and their design and concrete features remain a challenge that is yet to be tackled – collaboratively and in a coordinated manner. |
Has future work | The work presented here delineates our ini … The work presented here delineates our initial steps towards a
ualization of knowledge graph information. +knowledge graph for science. By testing existing and developing new components, we have so far focused on some core technical aspects of the infrastructure. Naturally, there are a number of research problems and implementation issues as well as a range of socio-technical aspects that need to be addressed in order to realize the vision. Dimensions of open challenges are, among others: • the low-threshold integration of researchers through methods of crowd-sourcing, human-machine interaction, and social networks; • automated analysis, quality assessment, and completion of the knowledge graph as well as interlinking with external sources; • support for representing fuzzy information, scientific discourse and the evolution of knowledge; • development of new methods of exploration, retrieval, and visualization of knowledge graph information. |
Has keywords | Knowledge Graph, Science and Technology, Research Infrastructure, Libraries, Information Science + |
Has motivation | No data available now. + |
Has platform | No data available now. + |
Has problem | No data available now. + |
Has relatedProblem | No data available now. + |
Has subject | Scholarly communication + |
Has vendor | No data available now. + |
Has year | 2018 + |
ImplementedIn ProgLang | No data available now. + |
Proposes Algorithm | No data available now. + |
RunsOn OS | No data available now. + |
Title | Towards a Knowledge Graph for Science + |
Uses Framework | No data available now. + |
Uses Methodology | No data available now. + |
Uses Toolbox | No data available now. + |