WM 2009

From Openresearch
Revision as of 21:05, 1 March 2012 by 64.214.229.95 (talk) (vzxAhfeLhEUqvHpg)
Jump to: navigation, search

agree. Also, popele needing to be billable / account for every hour of the day mostly perceive an internal barrier to share insights with other popele, since these insights may be the main thing setting them a part from their colleagues. Or, the insights may enable them to get the job done quicker than their colleagues, as knowledge is a personal USP. Also, some organisations maintain some levels of competition' within their organisation. Whether this is a good thing, I'll leave up to you to decide.To take this one level further . Let's assume that you have a company forum or wiki on which general population' can post questions/share information; would this be done for things other than e.g. a lost file?The solution to these questions in my view lie in how one is rewarded for ones contribution to the wiki-content. So, how could participants whose contributions add value be rewarded?Looking at the client side Is it the client or the product or service supplier who is hesitant to use a wiki?

Facts about "WM 2009"
AcronymWM 2009 +
End dateMarch 27, 2008 +
Event in seriesWM +
Event typeConference +
Has coordinates47° 19' 7", 7° 40' 11"Latitude: 47.318738888889
Longitude: 7.6698277777778
+
Has location citySolothurn +
Has location countryCategory:Switzerland +
Has sub eventPKM 2009 +
Homepagehttp://www.km-conference2009.org/ +
IsAEvent +
LogoLogo-wm-2009.png +
Start dateMarch 25, 2008 +
TitleProfessional Knowledge Management 2009 +