Difference between revisions of "Talk:PropertyUsageSorted"
| (4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
==Goal== | ==Goal== | ||
Decision on which properties are also needed for the migration to OR LTS based on https://www.openresearch.org/wiki/PropertyUsageSorted & https://www.openresearch.org/wiki/Iteration1_Property_Mapping | Decision on which properties are also needed for the migration to OR LTS based on https://www.openresearch.org/wiki/PropertyUsageSorted & https://www.openresearch.org/wiki/Iteration1_Property_Mapping | ||
| − | == | + | ==To Discuss== |
* all the one we need are tagged with [[Priority_Milestone::iteration 2]] | * all the one we need are tagged with [[Priority_Milestone::iteration 2]] | ||
| − | * meta-properties are tagged with [[isA::Meta-Property|meta-property]] instead of just [[isA::Property]] | + | ** this might need to be stored in a different property as iteration 2 is not really appropriate |
| + | * meta-properties are tagged with [[isA::Meta-Property|meta-property]] instead of just [[isA::Property]] (e.g. https://www.openresearch.org/wiki/Property:Usage_obligation) | ||
* Property:Has person = superproperty of board members etc → do we take this one or only the fine grained ones | * Property:Has person = superproperty of board members etc → do we take this one or only the fine grained ones | ||
| − | * how to deal with the ones I set up (e.g. Event type) that are not used yet but needed for DOI registration or ConfIDent | + | ** we shouldn't keep superproperties --> we need a technical descision wrt that |
| + | *** flatten out properties (e.g. the venue of an event) | ||
| + | * how to deal with the ones I set up (e.g. Event type) that are not used yet but needed for DOI registration or ConfIDent? | ||
** Event type ist tagged with iteration 1 the other with iteration 2 so far | ** Event type ist tagged with iteration 1 the other with iteration 2 so far | ||
| − | *** | + | *** Event Type will be dealt with see ticket... - it will probably only show up in the Form/Template but might not be reflected in the data for the presentation |
| − | |||
| − | |||
* venue should be an entity just like city, region and country | * venue should be an entity just like city, region and country | ||
| − | ** we can thus define the range of [[Has_coordinates]] to the [[Concept:Venue]] | + | ** we can thus define the range of [[Property:Has_coordinates]] & [[Property:Has_location_address]] to the [[Concept:Venue]] |
== TODO == | == TODO == | ||
| Line 38: | Line 39: | ||
see https://www.openresearch.org/wiki/Property:Has_person | see https://www.openresearch.org/wiki/Property:Has_person | ||
There would be an NLP problem for making that decision. | There would be an NLP problem for making that decision. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Currently all red links can be found here: https://www.openresearch.org/wiki/Special:WantedPages | ||
== IDs versus Entities == | == IDs versus Entities == | ||
Latest revision as of 12:43, 19 March 2021
Contents
Meeting notes 19.3.2021
Goal
Decision on which properties are also needed for the migration to OR LTS based on https://www.openresearch.org/wiki/PropertyUsageSorted & https://www.openresearch.org/wiki/Iteration1_Property_Mapping
To Discuss
- all the one we need are tagged with iteration 2
- this might need to be stored in a different property as iteration 2 is not really appropriate
- meta-properties are tagged with meta-property instead of just Property (e.g. https://www.openresearch.org/wiki/Property:Usage_obligation)
- Property:Has person = superproperty of board members etc → do we take this one or only the fine grained ones
- we shouldn't keep superproperties --> we need a technical descision wrt that
- flatten out properties (e.g. the venue of an event)
- we shouldn't keep superproperties --> we need a technical descision wrt that
- how to deal with the ones I set up (e.g. Event type) that are not used yet but needed for DOI registration or ConfIDent?
- Event type ist tagged with iteration 1 the other with iteration 2 so far
- Event Type will be dealt with see ticket... - it will probably only show up in the Form/Template but might not be reflected in the data for the presentation
- Event type ist tagged with iteration 1 the other with iteration 2 so far
- venue should be an entity just like city, region and country
- we can thus define the range of Property:Has_coordinates & Property:Has_location_address to the Concept:Venue
TODO
Create OpenRefine Project with iteration 1 and iteration2 properties.
Venue
Example: A venue is a location of an event and it basically consists of what https://www.openresearch.org/wiki/Property:Located_in currently has except that the address should be made more specific and e.g. point to an organization:
e.g. Mariott Hotel, Downtown New York, NY, USA
https://www.rsc.org/events/detail/42460/acs-medi-37th-national-medicinal-chemistry-symposium
Inheritance and N:M
The complexity of inheritance and n:M should be avoided if this is motivated by special and exotic cases
N:M
n:m example: 
inheritance
inheritance example: 
usage versus red links
red links are problematic e.g. for finding out which contributors are organizations and which ones are natural persons. see https://www.openresearch.org/wiki/Property:Has_person There would be an NLP problem for making that decision.
Currently all red links can be found here: https://www.openresearch.org/wiki/Special:WantedPages
IDs versus Entities
Person related data shall not be stored visibily in the OPENRSEARCH LTS. Ids (ORCIDs) and links/urls might be used instead.
