Difference between revisions of "Talk:PropertyUsageSorted"
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
* how to deal with the ones I set up (e.g. Event type) that are not used yet but needed for DOI registration or ConfIDent | * how to deal with the ones I set up (e.g. Event type) that are not used yet but needed for DOI registration or ConfIDent | ||
** Event type ist tagged with iteration 1 the other with iteration 2 so far | ** Event type ist tagged with iteration 1 the other with iteration 2 so far | ||
| + | *** this might need | ||
* we shouldn't keep superproperties --> we need a technical descision wrt that | * we shouldn't keep superproperties --> we need a technical descision wrt that | ||
| − | ** flatten out properties | + | ** flatten out properties (e.g. the venue of an event) |
Revision as of 11:23, 19 March 2021
Meeting notes 19.3.2021
Goal
Decision on which properties are also needed for the migration to OR LTS based on https://www.openresearch.org/wiki/PropertyUsageSorted & https://www.openresearch.org/wiki/Iteration1_Property_Mapping
TO Discuss
- all the one we need are tagged with iteration 2
- meta-properties are tagged with meta-property instead of just Property is this ok? (e.g. https://www.openresearch.org/wiki/Property:Usage_obligation)
- Property:Has person = superproperty of board members etc → do we take this one or only the fine grained ones
- how to deal with the ones I set up (e.g. Event type) that are not used yet but needed for DOI registration or ConfIDent
- Event type ist tagged with iteration 1 the other with iteration 2 so far
- this might need
- Event type ist tagged with iteration 1 the other with iteration 2 so far
- we shouldn't keep superproperties --> we need a technical descision wrt that
- flatten out properties (e.g. the venue of an event)
