A Probabilistic-Logical Framework for Ontology Matching
A Probabilistic-Logical Framework for Ontology Matching | |
---|---|
A Probabilistic-Logical Framework for Ontology Matching
| |
Bibliographical Metadata | |
Subject: | Ontology Matching |
Year: | 2010 |
Authors: | Mathias Niepert, Christian Meilicke, Heiner Stuckenschmidt |
Venue | AAAI |
Content Metadata | |
Problem: | No data available now. |
Approach: | No data available now. |
Implementation: | No data available now. |
Evaluation: | No data available now. |
Contents
Abstract
Ontology matching is the problem of determining correspondences between concepts, properties, and individuals of different heterogeneous ontologies. With this paper we present a novel probabilistic-logical framework for ontology matching based on Markov logic. We define the syntax and semantics and provide a formalization of the ontology matching problem within the framework. The approach has several advantages over existing methods such as ease of experimentation, incoherence mitigation during the alignment process, and the incorporation of apriori confidence values. We show empirically that the approach is efficient and more accurate than existing matchers on an established ontology alignment benchmark dataset.
Conclusion
We presented a Markov logic based framework for ontology matching capturing a wide range of matching strategies. Since these strategies are expressed with a unified syntax and semantics we can isolate variations and empirically evaluate their effects. Even though we focused only on a small subset of possible alignment strategies the results are already quite promising. We have also successfully learned weights for soft formulae within the framework. In cases where training data is not available, weights set manually by experts still result in improved alignment quality. Research related to determining appropriate weights based on structural properties of ontologies is a topic of future work.
Future work
The framework is not only useful for aligning concepts and properties but can also include instance matching. For this purpose, one would only need to add a hidden predicate modeling instance correspondences. The resulting matching approach would immediately benefit from probabilistic joint inference, taking into account the interdependencies between terminological and instance correspondences.
Approach
Positive Aspects: No data available now.
Negative Aspects: No data available now.
Limitations: No data available now.
Challenges: No data available now.
Proposes Algorithm: No data available now.
Methodology: No data available now.
Requirements: No data available now.
Limitations: No data available now.
Implementations
Download-page: No data available now.
Access API: No data available now.
Information Representation: No data available now.
Data Catalogue: {{{Catalogue}}}
Runs on OS: No data available now.
Vendor: No data available now.
Uses Framework: No data available now.
Has Documentation URL: No data available now.
Programming Language: No data available now.
Version: No data available now.
Platform: No data available now.
Toolbox: No data available now.
GUI: No
Research Problem
Subproblem of: No data available now.
RelatedProblem: No data available now.
Motivation: No data available now.
Evaluation
Experiment Setup: No data available now.
Evaluation Method : No data available now.
Hypothesis: No data available now.
Description: No data available now.
Dimensions: {{{Dimensions}}}
Benchmark used: No data available now.
Results: No data available now.
Access API | No data available now. + |
Event in series | AAAI + |
Has Benchmark | No data available now. + |
Has Challenges | No data available now. + |
Has DataCatalouge | {{{Catalogue}}} + |
Has Description | No data available now. + |
Has Dimensions | {{{Dimensions}}} + |
Has DocumentationURL | http://No data available now. + |
Has Downloadpage | http://No data available now. + |
Has Evaluation | No data available now. + |
Has EvaluationMethod | No data available now. + |
Has ExperimentSetup | No data available now. + |
Has GUI | No + |
Has Hypothesis | No data available now. + |
Has Implementation | No data available now. + |
Has InfoRepresentation | No data available now. + |
Has Limitations | No data available now. + |
Has NegativeAspects | No data available now. + |
Has PositiveAspects | No data available now. + |
Has Requirements | No data available now. + |
Has Results | No data available now. + |
Has Subproblem | No data available now. + |
Has Version | No data available now. + |
Has abstract | Ontology matching is the problem of determ … Ontology matching is the problem of determining correspondences between concepts, properties, and individuals of different heterogeneous ontologies. With this paper we present a novel probabilistic-logical framework for ontology matching based on Markov logic. We define the syntax and semantics and provide a formalization of the ontology matching problem within the framework. The approach has several advantages over existing methods such as ease of experimentation, incoherence mitigation during the alignment process, and the incorporation of apriori confidence values. We show empirically that the approach is efficient and more accurate than existing matchers on an established ontology alignment benchmark dataset. shed ontology alignment benchmark dataset. + |
Has approach | No data available now. + |
Has authors | Mathias Niepert +, Christian Meilicke + and Heiner Stuckenschmidt + |
Has conclusion | We presented a Markov logic based framewor … We presented a Markov logic based framework for ontology matching capturing a wide range of matching strategies. Since these strategies are expressed with a unified syntax and semantics we can isolate variations and empirically evaluate their effects. Even though we focused only on a small subset of possible alignment strategies the results are already quite promising. We have also successfully learned weights for soft formulae within the framework. In cases
where training data is not available, weights set manually by experts still result in improved alignment quality. Research related to determining appropriate weights based on structural properties of ontologies is a topic of future work. s of ontologies is a topic of future work. + |
Has future work | The framework is not only useful for align … The framework is not only useful for aligning concepts and properties but can also include instance matching. For this purpose, one would only need to add a hidden predicate modeling instance correspondences. The resulting matching
approach would immediately benefit from probabilistic joint inference, taking into account the interdependencies between terminological and instance correspondences. rminological and instance correspondences. + |
Has motivation | No data available now. + |
Has platform | No data available now. + |
Has problem | No data available now. + |
Has relatedProblem | No data available now. + |
Has subject | Ontology Matching + |
Has vendor | No data available now. + |
Has year | 2010 + |
ImplementedIn ProgLang | No data available now. + |
Proposes Algorithm | No data available now. + |
RunsOn OS | No data available now. + |
Title | A Probabilistic-Logical Framework for Ontology Matching + |
Uses Framework | No data available now. + |
Uses Methodology | No data available now. + |
Uses Toolbox | No data available now. + |